泽视
Beijing Zeshi Technology Co., Ltd Utilities iPhoneiPadiPod touch
泽视 is a free Utilities app for iPhone and iPad by Beijing Zeshi Technology Co., Ltd. Requires iOS 13.0. Updated July 19, 2026.
- Price
- Free
- on the App Store
- Size
- 23 MB
- Age 17+
- Updated
- Jul 19
- 2026 · v1.3.0
Screenshots
About 泽视
泽视是一款带"信息流"体验的网页浏览器：把网页做成一张张卡片，划动浏览、轻点展开，不用一个个搜，也能不断发现值得一看的内容。 【怎么用】 · 逛着发现：网页以卡片信息流呈现，划动浏览、快速判断，减少无效点击。 · 就地展开：轻点卡片当场展开成完整网页，支持前进/后退、页内查找、桌面模式。 · 精选不杂乱：按热度与质量精选呈现，把更可靠、更值得读的网页放前面。 · 收藏与历史：随手收藏好内容，历史帮你找回看过的网页。 · 清爽护眼：界面简洁、专注内容，支持深色模式。 【内容更安心】 泽视内置内容审核机制，对进入信息流的网页做多维度安全与质量评估，努力呈现更可靠的内容。 【隐私优先】 坚持最小必要原则收集信息，与服务器通信全程加密。详见应用内《隐私政策》。 — 开发者：北京泽视科技有限公司 联系邮箱：[email protected]
What’s new
Version 1.3.0 · Updated July 19, 2026
优化搜索体验，修复已知问题
App privacy
The developer, Beijing Zeshi Technology Co., Ltd, reported these privacy practices to Apple.
Data Linked to You
The following data, which may be collected and linked to your identity, may be used for the following purposes:
- Usage Data: Product Interaction
- Contact Info: Phone Number
- User Content: Other User Content
- Identifiers: User ID
Used for: Analytics, App Functionality
Data Not Linked to You
The following data, which may be collected but is not linked to your identity, may be used for the following purposes:
- Diagnostics: Other Diagnostic Data
- Usage Data: Product Interaction
Used for: Analytics, Product Personalization, App Functionality
Alternatives to 泽视
Looking for apps like 泽视? Here are 6 similar apps on the App Store. The highest rated is SRT双语字幕翻译 (5.0/5), and all 6 are free to download.
| App | Rating | Price | Last updated | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 泽视 | – | Free | July 19, 2026 | |
| MINI123轻应用 | – | Free | Mar 9, 2026 | Compare |
| FbbYun浏览器 | – | Free | Oct 22, 2025 | Compare |
| 暖柚收藏夹 | – | Free | Jan 27, 2026 | Compare |
| SRT双语字幕翻译 | 5.0 / 5 (1) | Free | Nov 10, 2025 | Compare |
| 天天连测 | – | Free | May 21, 2025 | Compare |
| MultiOpen | – | Free | Sep 19, 2026 | Compare |
Compare 泽视 with the top alternatives: ratings, updates, ASO score and keyword gaps →