Compare Flow
iENGINEERING Corporation Productivity iPhoneiPadiPod touch
Compare Flow is a free Productivity app for iPhone and iPad by iENGINEERING Corporation. Rated 4.6/5 from 5 ratings. Requires iOS 15.1.
- Rating
- 4.6
- 5 ratings
- Price
- Free
- on the App Store
- Size
- 23 MB
- Age 4+
- Updated
- Oct 9
- 2025 · v3.0.1
Screenshots
About Compare Flow
Compare Flow app uses Manning's Formula, the most widely accepted formula for evaluating the hydraulic capacity of non-pressure sewers. In order to evaluate possible alternatives in either pipe geometry or material, use this app to compare the hydraulic flow capacity among various concrete pipes including circular, elliptical, arch and box sections with circular thermoplastic and corrugated metal pipes.
Ratings & reviews
4.6
5 ratings
What’s new
Version 3.0.1 · Updated October 9, 2025
UI improvements for better usability. Added the option to enter custom dimensions for circular and box pipes.
App privacy
The developer, iENGINEERING Corporation, reported these privacy practices to Apple.
Data Not Collected
The developer does not collect any data from this app.
Alternatives to Compare Flow
Looking for apps like Compare Flow? Here are 6 similar apps on the App Store. The highest rated is iHP48 (4.6/5), and all 6 are free to download.
-
Open Channel Flow Lite
-
iHP48
4.6
-
Bluebeam
1.5
-
QField for QGIS
4.1
-
ArcGIS Field Maps
2.1
-
Motus - Business Mileage Log
4.5
| App | Rating | Price | Last updated | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compare Flow | 4.6 / 5 (5 ratings) | Free | October 9, 2025 | |
| Open Channel Flow Lite | – | Free | Oct 13, 2026 | Compare |
| iHP48 | 4.6 / 5 (302) | Free | Nov 17, 2024 | Compare |
| Bluebeam | 1.5 / 5 (406) | Free | Sep 23, 2026 | Compare |
| QField for QGIS | 4.1 / 5 (37) | Free | Oct 2, 2026 | Compare |
| ArcGIS Field Maps | 2.1 / 5 (55) | Free | Jul 20, 2026 | Compare |
| Motus - Business Mileage Log | 4.5 / 5 (8,692) | Free | Oct 15, 2026 | Compare |
Compare Compare Flow with the top alternatives: ratings, updates, ASO score and keyword gaps →