Corn Field Scout
Purdue University Education
The Purdue Corn Field Scout is the perfect in-field reference
- Downloads
- 100+
- on Google Play
- Price
- $5.99
- No in-app purchases
- Updated
- Mar 28
- 2017 · v1.0.1
Screenshots
About Corn Field Scout
Growers and consultants have relied on the Purdue Extension Corn & Soybean Field Guide for more than 20 years. This is the perfect in-field reference that takes the popular guide to the next level. Purdue University specialists created this comprehensive, science-based app to help you effectively manage corn production.
You can check out a free preview of this app, Purdue Extension Corn Field Scout Preview, that has limited functionality.
The Purdue Extension Corn Field Scout provides built-in calculators for seeding rates, estimating yield loss, limestone recommendations, nitrogen recommendations, phosphorus recommendations, and potassium recommendations. There’s even a section to add field notes.
The Insects & Nematodes, Diseases, and Weeds sections will help you identify the common pests of corn and the damage they cause. You’ll also find sampling and management information.
The Soils & Fertility section provides the latest nutrient recommendations and shows common signs of nutrient deficiencies.
The Diagnosing Herbicide Injury section provides a tool for identifying herbicide injury and describes herbicide modes of action.
And the Planting, Growth, & Development section provides information about identifying and predicting growth stages.
This app includes hundreds of useful, high-quality images to help you diagnose problems and understand common issues in corn production.
We also offer a companion app: The Purdue Extension Soybean Field Scout.
You can check out a free preview of this app, Purdue Extension Corn Field Scout Preview, that has limited functionality.
The Purdue Extension Corn Field Scout provides built-in calculators for seeding rates, estimating yield loss, limestone recommendations, nitrogen recommendations, phosphorus recommendations, and potassium recommendations. There’s even a section to add field notes.
The Insects & Nematodes, Diseases, and Weeds sections will help you identify the common pests of corn and the damage they cause. You’ll also find sampling and management information.
The Soils & Fertility section provides the latest nutrient recommendations and shows common signs of nutrient deficiencies.
The Diagnosing Herbicide Injury section provides a tool for identifying herbicide injury and describes herbicide modes of action.
And the Planting, Growth, & Development section provides information about identifying and predicting growth stages.
This app includes hundreds of useful, high-quality images to help you diagnose problems and understand common issues in corn production.
We also offer a companion app: The Purdue Extension Soybean Field Scout.
What’s new
Version 1.0.1 · Updated March 28, 2017
• Allow for orientation change in image detail. • Fixed bug in Phosphorus Recommendations calculator. • Fixed bug in Phosphorus Recommendations arrow placement. • Fixed bug in Estimating Yield Loss Due to Defoliation.
Alternatives to Corn Field Scout
Looking for apps like Corn Field Scout? Here are 5 similar Android apps on Google Play. The highest rated is Liberating Structures (4.8/5), and all 5 are free to download.
-
Planti: Plant Care 4.3
-
Famtree 2.8
-
Gardenize: Garden & Plant care 3.6
-
Plant Identifier & Care - Greg 4.5
-
Liberating Structures 4.8
| App | Rating | Price | Installs | Last updated | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corn Field Scout | – | $5.99 | 100+ | Mar 28, 2017 | |
| Planti: Plant Care | 4.3 / 5 | Free | 10,000+ | Oct 30, 2026 | Compare |
| Famtree | 2.8 / 5 | Free | 50,000+ | Dec 20, 2019 | Compare |
| Gardenize: Garden & Plant care | 3.6 / 5 | Free | 100,000+ | Oct 10, 2024 | Compare |
| Plant Identifier & Care - Greg | 4.5 / 5 | Free | 500,000+ | Oct 23, 2026 | Compare |
| Liberating Structures | 4.8 / 5 | Free | 50,000+ | Aug 28, 2026 | Compare |
Compare Corn Field Scout with the top alternatives: ratings, updates, ASO score and keyword gaps →