AppPage.net

Screenshots

  • Pocket Pool Quest screenshot 1
  • Pocket Pool Quest screenshot 2
  • Pocket Pool Quest screenshot 3
  • Pocket Pool Quest screenshot 4

About Pocket Pool Quest

Pocket Pool Quest is a single-player pool challenge built for quick, satisfying shots. Line up the cue, control the power, and sink the target balls across 20 compact levels with steadily rising difficulty. Early stages teach clean angles and shot timing; later layouts add tighter shot limits, blockers, ordered targets, and shorter aim guides. Every round is short, replayable, and easy to restart. Earn up to three stars on each level, improve your best shot count, and unlock the full table of challenges at your own pace. Earn diamonds by clearing levels or by choosing to watch an optional rewarded ad, then use them to unlock table and cue styles. Diamonds are virtual game currency only and are not sold for real money.

App privacy

The developer, 梦营 陈, reported these privacy practices to Apple.

Data Used to Track You

The following data may be used to track you across apps and websites owned by other companies:

  • Identifiers: Device ID

Data Not Linked to You

The following data, which may be collected but is not linked to your identity, may be used for the following purposes:

  • Identifiers: Device ID

Used for: Analytics, App Functionality

Alternatives to Pocket Pool Quest

Looking for apps like Pocket Pool Quest? Here are 6 similar apps on the App Store. The highest rated is Backgammon Mint (4.2/5), and all 6 are free to download.

Pocket Pool Quest vs. alternatives
App Rating Price Last updated Compare
Pocket Pool Quest – Free August 4, 2026
Memory Dash: Brain Runner – Free Aug 10, 2026 Compare
Backgammon Flash - Online PvP – Free Sep 1, 2026 Compare
Cuevora 8 Ball – Free Oct 9, 2026 Compare
Block Art-Pixel Puzzle – Free Mar 11, 2026 Compare
Backgammon Mint 4.2 / 5 (5) Free Feb 23, 2026 Compare
Pool City - 8 Ball – Free Apr 13, 2026 Compare

Compare Pocket Pool Quest with the top alternatives: ratings, updates, ASO score and keyword gaps →