居然工作台
Beijing Easyhome Furniture Franchise Co.,Ltd. Lifestyle iPhoneiPadiPod touch
居然工作台 is a free Lifestyle app for iPhone and iPad by Beijing Easyhome Furniture Franchise Co.,Ltd. Requires iOS 13.0. Updated September 25, 2026.
- Price
- Free
- on the App Store
- Size
- 233 MB
- Age 4+
- Updated
- Sep 25
- 2026 · v4.0.6
Screenshots
About 居然工作台
居然工作台APP，是专为家装家居行业企业打造的专属数字化运营工具，聚焦居然之家卖场商户服务，助力商户实现高效数字化经营。 作为家装家居产业数字化赋能平台，APP深度贴合居然之家卖场商户需求，整合卖场运营、商户管理等核心功能，优化运营效率、打通协同壁垒，为商户提供便捷精准的运营支持，助力降本增效、规范管理。 核心功能：【导购工作台】一站式覆盖订单、线索、带单、拉新等导购全流程需求；【代客下单】线下快速录单、关联库存，规避漏错单、便捷跟进交付；【数据概览】一键呈现客流量、销售额等核心指标，支撑科学经营；【分享赚钱】一键生成专属链接，成交可获奖励，拓宽获客渠道。
What’s new
Version 4.0.6 · Updated September 25, 2026
- 优化一些功能体验
App privacy
The developer, Beijing Easyhome Furniture Franchise Co.,Ltd., reported these privacy practices to Apple.
Data Used to Track You
The following data may be used to track you across apps and websites owned by other companies:
- Usage Data: Product Interaction
Data Not Linked to You
The following data, which may be collected but is not linked to your identity, may be used for the following purposes:
- Location: Coarse Location
- User Content: Emails or Text Messages, Photos or Videos, Audio Data, Other User Content
- Search History: Search History
- Identifiers: User ID, Device ID
- Usage Data: Product Interaction
- Diagnostics: Crash Data, Performance Data
Used for: App Functionality
Alternatives to 居然工作台
Looking for apps like 居然工作台? Here are 6 similar apps on the App Store. The highest rated is 洞窝-全场景家居消费服务 (5.0/5), and all 6 are free to download.
| App | Rating | Price | Last updated | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 居然工作台 | – | Free | September 25, 2026 | |
| 洞窝-全场景家居消费服务 | 5.0 / 5 (1) | Free | Jul 15, 2026 | Compare |
| 智慧慕思 | – | Free | Mar 20, 2026 | Compare |
| 居然装饰-家装家居设计装修一站式服务平台 | – | Free | Nov 28, 2024 | Compare |
| 臻惠家装 | – | Free | Jul 20, 2026 | Compare |
| 箭牌智家 | – | Free | Jul 18, 2026 | Compare |
| 芝华仕5星床垫 | – | Free | Aug 14, 2024 | Compare |
Compare 居然工作台 with the top alternatives: ratings, updates, ASO score and keyword gaps →