麻雀何切る牌効率
Naoki Nakamichi Games iPhoneiPadiPod touch
麻雀何切る牌効率 is a free Games app for iPhone and iPad by Naoki Nakamichi. Rated 5.0/5 from 2 ratings. Requires iOS 15.0. Updated October 13, 2026.
- Rating
- 5.0
- 2 ratings
- Price
- Free
- on the App Store
- Size
- 127 MB
- Age 4+
- Updated
- Oct 13
- 2026 · v2.8.0
Screenshots
About 麻雀何切る牌効率
麻雀の基本となる牌効率を極めましょう。 有効牌の枚数と和了の得点を併せて和了期待値の感覚を身につけましょう。 1万問以上の問題を収録しており、間違えた問題は復習機能で再度学習可能です。 利用規約（EULA）: https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/
What’s new
Version 2.8.0 · Updated October 13, 2026
みんなの何切るの「注目」タブの並び順を改善しました。最近投稿された問題の中から、良問の評価や理由つきの回答が多い問題、意見が割れている問題が上に表示されるようになりました。
App privacy
The developer, Naoki Nakamichi, reported these privacy practices to Apple.
Data Used to Track You
The following data may be used to track you across apps and websites owned by other companies:
- Identifiers: Device ID
Data Not Linked to You
The following data, which may be collected but is not linked to your identity, may be used for the following purposes:
- Usage Data: Advertising Data
- Identifiers: Device ID, User ID
- Diagnostics: Crash Data
Used for: Third-Party Advertising, Developer’s Advertising or Marketing, Analytics, App Functionality
Alternatives to 麻雀何切る牌効率
Looking for apps like 麻雀何切る牌効率? Here are 6 similar apps on the App Store. The highest rated is 麻雀ウザク式何切る？ (5.0/5), and all 6 are free to download.
-
麻雀ウザク式何切る？
5.0
-
麻雀 一択何切る
-
麻雀トレ Lite
-
麻雀 何切るマスター
-
Riichi Mah-jong Helper
5.0
-
Riichi Mahjong Scoring Drill
| App | Rating | Price | Last updated | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 麻雀何切る牌効率 | 5.0 / 5 (2 ratings) | Free | October 13, 2026 | |
| 麻雀ウザク式何切る？ | 5.0 / 5 (2) | Free | Sep 23, 2026 | Compare |
| 麻雀 一択何切る | – | Free | Nov 7, 2025 | Compare |
| 麻雀トレ Lite | – | Free | Aug 7, 2026 | Compare |
| 麻雀 何切るマスター | – | Free | Jul 17, 2025 | Compare |
| Riichi Mah-jong Helper | 5.0 / 5 (1) | Free | Sep 14, 2026 | Compare |
| Riichi Mahjong Scoring Drill | – | Free | Oct 5, 2026 | Compare |
Compare 麻雀何切る牌効率 with the top alternatives: ratings, updates, ASO score and keyword gaps →