AppPage.net

Screenshots

  • 致美形象设计 screenshot 1
  • 致美形象设计 screenshot 2
  • 致美形象设计 screenshot 3
  • 致美形象设计 screenshot 4

About 致美形象设计

致美形象设计是一家关注形象管理的穿搭软件,是您身边的形象师!在小红书穿衣搭配、抖音自媒体上备受推崇的智能穿衣搭配形象提升App,能够为你找到适合的服装搭配和妆容发型。 致美形象设计app是一款独特而专业的搭配衣服的软件,为用户提供个性化的时尚体验的穿搭神器。我们的APP与搭你、得物、搭搭、好搭盒子、穿衣助手、穿搭盒子等相比的独特之处在于:通过创造角色,我们帮助你探索时尚搭配,通过穿衣风格、脸型、发型、配饰、颜值、妆容,让你在时尚世界中了解自己提升品味。 主要功能一览: ·穿搭风格检测: 通过量感/曲直/内在测试,快速定位你的穿衣风格。 ·肤色检测:智能检测肤色类型,匹配适合你的穿搭颜色、发色。 ·体型检测: 通过AI体型算法公式识别体型类型,找到合适你的服装版型。 ·发型设计: 通过五官分析,AI智能识别脸型,匹配适合的发型及修剪方案。 ·妆容设计: 通过三庭五眼等面部结构检测分析,设计适合你的妆容及画法。 ·更多形象工具:通过脸型测试、皮相骨相测试、眼镜搭配、帽子等配饰搭配等功能,深入了解用户独特的时尚喜好,为每位用户打造专属的时尚体验。 AI技术助你解决个性化的时尚难题,提供个性化的时尚建议。丰富的工具箱不仅提供专业的时尚服务,更带来有趣的时尚体验。 下载致美形象设计app,释放你的时尚创造力,发现属于你个性的时尚之美!

What’s new

Version 1.0.3 · Updated December 16, 2024

1、细化界面、优化细节

App privacy

The developer, Yoosha Technology(Hefei) Company Limited, reported these privacy practices to Apple.

Data Used to Track You

The following data may be used to track you across apps and websites owned by other companies:

  • Identifiers: Device ID

Data Not Linked to You

The following data, which may be collected but is not linked to your identity, may be used for the following purposes:

  • Usage Data: Advertising Data
  • Identifiers: User ID, Device ID
  • Diagnostics: Crash Data

Used for: Third-Party Advertising, Analytics, App Functionality, Other Purposes

Alternatives to 致美形象设计

Looking for apps like 致美形象设计? Here are 6 similar apps on the App Store. The highest rated is Calorie Counter+ Recipe: Fooda (5.0/5), and all 6 are free to download.

致美形象设计 vs. alternatives
App Rating Price Last updated Compare
致美形象设计 – Free December 16, 2024
衣色 – Free Oct 14, 2026 Compare
衣搭-智能AI试穿,随身穿搭形象顾问,买衣服虚拟试穿神器 – Free Dec 14, 2025 Compare
AI发型设计-智能匹配发型,测发型软件 1.0 / 5 (1) Free May 7, 2025 Compare
Calorie Counter+ Recipe: Fooda 5.0 / 5 (1) Free Apr 9, 2024 Compare
AI Try-On - Virtual Dressing 4.6 / 5 (79) Free Jul 24, 2026 Compare
Lune: Private Period Tracker – Free Oct 14, 2026 Compare

Compare 致美形象设计 with the top alternatives: ratings, updates, ASO score and keyword gaps →