根源优课
郑州繁若技术有限公司 Utilities iPhoneiPadiPod touch
根源优课 is a free Utilities app for iPhone and iPad by 郑州繁若技术有限公司. Rated 2.6/5 from 5 ratings. Requires iOS 13.0. Updated October 15, 2026.
- Rating
- 2.6
- 5 ratings
- Price
- Free
- on the App Store
- Size
- 127 MB
- Age 4+
- Updated
- Oct 15
- 2026 · v6.0.1
Screenshots
About 根源优课
【稳定的音视频互动】 支持千人级别并发无延迟 最多与10名参与者同时音视频互动 【多种工具协助】 协作白板: 支持激光笔、画笔、文字、图形等多种工具，辅助演示 屏幕共享: 支持共享桌面及各种应用，多端实时同步查看 分组讨论: 支持自动分配、手动分配等分组模式 特色工具: 提供计时器、选择器、互动小游戏等多种特色工具 【无限文档云盘】 课程文档云端储存 选择文档实时极速展示 支持展示PPT、PDF、Word、MP3、MP4、板书、测评等多种格式文档
Ratings & reviews
2.6
5 ratings
What’s new
Version 6.0.1 · Updated October 15, 2026
「新增」 1. 首页新增全局搜索 2. 课外支持头像及名称展示 3. 新增幻影笔 4. 新增OMO站播模式 5. 连麦头像支持横向/纵向布局 6. 图形等支持水平、垂直翻转 「优化」 1. 优化随机选人 2. 登录页登录方式优化 3. 支持修改答题卡答案 4. 荧光笔功能优化 5. 云盘操作优化 6. 去除课堂左右布局 7. 网页加载优化 8. 课堂噪音优化
App privacy
The developer, 郑州繁若技术有限公司, reported these privacy practices to Apple.
Data Used to Track You
The following data may be used to track you across apps and websites owned by other companies:
- Identifiers: Device ID
Data Not Linked to You
The following data, which may be collected but is not linked to your identity, may be used for the following purposes:
- Contact Info: Phone Number
- Identifiers: Device ID
- Usage Data: Product Interaction
- Diagnostics: Crash Data, Performance Data, Other Diagnostic Data
Used for: Analytics, App Functionality
Alternatives to 根源优课
Looking for apps like 根源优课? Here are 6 similar apps on the App Store. The highest rated is 核桃编程 (4.9/5), and all 6 are free to download.
| App | Rating | Price | Last updated | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 根源优课 | 2.6 / 5 (5 ratings) | Free | October 15, 2026 | |
| 豆伴匠 | 3.8 / 5 (8) | Free | Oct 19, 2026 | Compare |
| 小鹿素养 | – | Free | Oct 23, 2026 | Compare |
| 知林智学 | 2.0 / 5 (1) | Free | Sep 23, 2026 | Compare |
| 豆神超练 | 4.0 / 5 (4) | Free | Oct 19, 2026 | Compare |
| 大招魔方 | 2.1 / 5 (9) | Free | Sep 22, 2026 | Compare |
| 核桃编程 | 4.9 / 5 (7) | Free | Sep 28, 2026 | Compare |
Compare 根源优课 with the top alternatives: ratings, updates, ASO score and keyword gaps →