AppPage.net

Screenshots

  • 利嘉閣‧按揭易 screenshot 1
  • 利嘉閣‧按揭易 screenshot 2
  • 利嘉閣‧按揭易 screenshot 3
  • 利嘉閣‧按揭易 screenshot 4

About 利嘉閣‧按揭易

利嘉閣‧按揭易 提供一站式按揭服務及資訊,集「按揭計算機」、按揭轉介申請及跟進於一身,助您輕鬆完成按揭流程。 提供工具及服務包括: - 按揭計算機,提供多種計算模式 (每月供款、最高負擔樓價和最短還款年期及利息等),緊貼最新政府樓按措施變化合符最新政策要求,並提供按揭保費功能。 - 免費物業估價服務 - e按揭評估(可獲悉我們按揭專員提供的「預先評估結果」) - e按揭申請

What’s new

Version 7.1.6 · Updated September 10, 2026

全新使用者界面, 按揭計算更加得心應手!!! - 全新 火險申請功能! - 更新 “2024 財政預算案“ 計算方式 (取消AVD以外其他印花稅, 取消壓測, 按揭成數限制, 保費更新) - 更新 "首置稅" 計算方式 - 支援 輸入 "混合年期" 利率計算 - 支援 "找樓價"、"找年期"保費計算 - 新增 "置業總開支" 計算 - 系統優化

App privacy

The developer, Ricacorp Properties Limited, reported these privacy practices to Apple.

Data Used to Track You

The following data may be used to track you across apps and websites owned by other companies:

  • Usage Data: Product Interaction

Data Linked to You

The following data, which may be collected and linked to your identity, may be used for the following purposes:

  • Usage Data: Product Interaction
  • Contact Info: Physical Address, Email Address, Name, Phone Number

Used for: Third-Party Advertising, App Functionality

Data Not Linked to You

The following data, which may be collected but is not linked to your identity, may be used for the following purposes:

  • User Content: Photos or Videos
  • Identifiers: Device ID
  • Diagnostics: Crash Data

Used for: App Functionality

Alternatives to 利嘉閣‧按揭易

Looking for apps like 利嘉閣‧按揭易? Here are 6 similar apps on the App Store. The highest rated is Citibank HK (4.8/5), and all 6 are free to download.

利嘉閣‧按揭易 vs. alternatives
App Rating Price Last updated Compare
利嘉閣‧按揭易 – Free September 10, 2026
House730 - Search HK Property 4.7 / 5 (22) Free Oct 13, 2026 Compare
中原地產 Centaline Property 3.1 / 5 (7) Free Sep 23, 2026 Compare
28Hse 4.7 / 5 (181) Free Sep 17, 2026 Compare
Citibank HK 4.8 / 5 (1,528) Free Oct 15, 2026 Compare
DBS digibank HK 4.5 / 5 (344) Free Oct 3, 2026 Compare
Mox Bank 4.8 / 5 (534) Free Oct 6, 2026 Compare

Compare 利嘉閣‧按揭易 with the top alternatives: ratings, updates, ASO score and keyword gaps →