AppPage.net

Screenshots

  • 成长兔-专注英语启蒙教育 screenshot 1
  • 成长兔-专注英语启蒙教育 screenshot 2
  • 成长兔-专注英语启蒙教育 screenshot 3
  • 成长兔-专注英语启蒙教育 screenshot 4

About 成长兔-专注英语启蒙教育

为6岁以上儿童和家长制定的智能英语伴学系统 以学习兴趣为前提,过程结合密集的练习频率、系统学习的课程体系、丰富的语言学习资源,以输出、检测和鼓励为结尾,用科学合理的教学逻辑提供给孩子和家长一款优质的启蒙英语教育产品。 【学习兴趣】游戏化、情景式、任务制为核心,不沉迷、不困难、不断激励的形式将课程呈现给用户 【课中学习】互动练习、及时反馈、先听后说,大量的有效互动贯穿课程 【课后检测】以输出为目标,进行多次检测及检测后的及时鼓励,让孩子学习过程中不沉浸、更愿意、更主动的学 转变市场常规教学方式,从“读-背-写-听”到“听-说-读-写-练”,提供科学的母语启蒙方式 课程内容覆盖年龄和语言能力两个维度,分为英语语言吸收期、英语词汇积累期、英语口语表达期、英语阅读兴趣期,为6岁+年龄段的孩子和家长提供双语故事、精美儿歌、体系课、原版绘本等多个产品内容。更是涵盖了真人外教互动对话、情景式互动教学、大量听力互动练习、海量经典原版绘本、趣味配音互动,帮助孩子顺利过渡到小学课程,帮助家长轻松完成英语启蒙教育。 精彩多多,价格不贵

What’s new

Version 2.9.21 · Updated October 20, 2026

Fix bugs

App privacy

The developer, 北京启萌教育科技有限公司, reported these privacy practices to Apple.

Data Linked to You

The following data, which may be collected and linked to your identity, may be used for the following purposes:

  • Identifiers: User ID, Device ID
  • Usage Data: Product Interaction
  • Diagnostics: Other Diagnostic Data
  • Contact Info: Physical Address, Name, Phone Number
  • User Content: Photos or Videos, Audio Data

Used for: Analytics, App Functionality

Data Not Linked to You

The following data, which may be collected but is not linked to your identity, may be used for the following purposes:

  • Diagnostics: Crash Data, Performance Data

Used for: Analytics

Alternatives to 成长兔-专注英语启蒙教育

Looking for apps like 成长兔-专注英语启蒙教育? Here are 6 similar apps on the App Store. The highest rated is 豚小蒙-阅读陪伴,快乐成长 (5.0/5), and all 6 are free to download.

成长兔-专注英语启蒙教育 vs. alternatives
App Rating Price Last updated Compare
成长兔-专注英语启蒙教育 5.0 / 5 (1 rating) Free October 20, 2026
摄影器材库 4.0 / 5 (4) Free Jan 18, 2024 Compare
步步ABC-牛津少儿英语早教启蒙 4.7 / 5 (9) Free Sep 17, 2026 Compare
EnglishPlanet 4.2 / 5 (5) Free Oct 28, 2026 Compare
毛豆爱古诗 4.8 / 5 (37) Free Jul 7, 2026 Compare
小花生网 4.6 / 5 (128) Free Aug 5, 2025 Compare
豚小蒙-阅读陪伴,快乐成长 5.0 / 5 (3) Free Oct 8, 2026 Compare

Compare 成长兔-专注英语启蒙教育 with the top alternatives: ratings, updates, ASO score and keyword gaps →