AppPage.net

Screenshots

  • UNIVERGE BLUE™ PROTECT screenshot 1
  • UNIVERGE BLUE™ PROTECT screenshot 2
  • UNIVERGE BLUE™ PROTECT screenshot 3
  • UNIVERGE BLUE™ PROTECT screenshot 4

About UNIVERGE BLUE™ PROTECT

UNIVERGE BLUE™ PROTECT is a two-factor authentication app that adds an additional layer of security, by requesting an additional code, when you sign in to your UNIVERGE BLUE service. - If you choose to use Push Notifications, the PROTECT app will display a message asking you to ‘Allow’ or ‘Deny’ access to your user account. Confirm it is you logging in by selecting ‘Allow’. - If you are using one-time passcodes, the PROTECT app will generate a one-time passcode that must be entered in order to access an UNIVERGE BLUE service.

What’s new

Version 2.0.15 · Updated December 5, 2024

bugfixes

App privacy

The developer, NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, reported these privacy practices to Apple.

Data Linked to You

The following data, which may be collected and linked to your identity, may be used for the following purposes:

  • Contact Info: Phone Number

Used for: App Functionality

Data Not Linked to You

The following data, which may be collected but is not linked to your identity, may be used for the following purposes:

  • Usage Data: Product Interaction
  • Diagnostics: Crash Data

Used for: Analytics, App Functionality

Alternatives to UNIVERGE BLUE™ PROTECT

Looking for apps like UNIVERGE BLUE™ PROTECT? Here are 6 similar apps on the App Store. The highest rated is Intermedia VeriKey (3.7/5), and all 6 are free to download.

UNIVERGE BLUE™ PROTECT vs. alternatives
App Rating Price Last updated Compare
UNIVERGE BLUE™ PROTECT 5.0 / 5 (1 rating) Free December 5, 2024
DoubleSafe 2.2 / 5 (5) Free Dec 5, 2024 Compare
AdvancedUC Plus – Free Jul 8, 2026 Compare
Luminex – Free Jun 10, 2026 Compare
NovoOne – Free Oct 2, 2026 Compare
Scan QR-code – Free Aug 19, 2024 Compare
Intermedia VeriKey 3.7 / 5 (6) Free Dec 5, 2024 Compare

Compare UNIVERGE BLUE™ PROTECT with the top alternatives: ratings, updates, ASO score and keyword gaps →