AppPage.net

Screenshots

  • Eyedea Refractive screenshot 1
  • Eyedea Refractive screenshot 2
  • Eyedea Refractive screenshot 3
  • Eyedea Refractive screenshot 4

About Eyedea Refractive

Clinical calculator for Refractive Surgery, designed to support pre- and post-operative evaluation of LASIK, Lenticular Extraction (SMILE), and PRK, based on current medical literature. From the patient's pre-operative data, it calculates post-nomogram refraction, central and maximum ablation, residual stromal bed, PTA/PSTA, LASIK Ectasia Risk Score, predicted final keratometry, mitomycin time, and more. In postoperative evaluation, it analyzes spherical refractive outcome along with PTA and keratometry variation, classifying results into objective clinical categories. Results are intended as clinical decision support and should always be correlated with the patient's in-person evaluation.

What’s new

Version 3.3.3 · Updated August 22, 2026

• Enhanced search for saved evaluations. • General improvements and bug fixes.

App privacy

The developer, Eyedea Educacao e Desenvolvimento em Oftalmologia LTDA, reported these privacy practices to Apple.

Data Not Linked to You

The following data, which may be collected but is not linked to your identity, may be used for the following purposes:

  • Usage Data: Product Interaction

Used for: Analytics

Alternatives to Eyedea Refractive

Looking for apps like Eyedea Refractive? Here are 6 similar apps on the App Store. The highest rated is Cybersight (5.0/5), and all 6 are free to download.

Eyedea Refractive vs. alternatives
App Rating Price Last updated Compare
Eyedea Refractive 5.0 / 5 (3 ratings) Free August 22, 2026
Keraring Planner – Free Feb 21, 2026 Compare
IOL Reference 4.7 / 5 (15) Free Jun 24, 2026 Compare
Eye GIFs - Patient Education 3.8 / 5 (14) Free Feb 4, 2026 Compare
Mirax – Free May 2, 2025 Compare
AAO eBooks 3.8 / 5 (5) Free Jul 1, 2025 Compare
Cybersight 5.0 / 5 (3) Free Oct 12, 2026 Compare

Compare Eyedea Refractive with the top alternatives: ratings, updates, ASO score and keyword gaps →