AppPage.net

Screenshots

  • 向日葵保险人-保险展业获客签单赚钱神器! screenshot 1
  • 向日葵保险人-保险展业获客签单赚钱神器! screenshot 2
  • 向日葵保险人-保险展业获客签单赚钱神器! screenshot 3
  • 向日葵保险人-保险展业获客签单赚钱神器! screenshot 4

About 向日葵保险人-保险展业获客签单赚钱神器!

300万保险代理人都在用的神器 1.【产品】专属保险产品,种类多又全,高性价比。推广费达80%。 2.【计划书】保障条款清晰,保费测算零误差,利益演示更准确。 3.【海报】海量素材,节日祝福。一次分享引爆朋友圈,客户时刻关注你。 4.【技巧】详解各类爆品,图文并茂、案例清晰。大咖手把手教你怎么卖保险。 上不封顶的高额推广奖励 5.【新手专享】新人即可获得30元现金奖励。 6.【会员体系】提升会员等级,获取高额签单奖励金,最高超过400元/单哦! 7.【邀请有奖】一次邀请,永久获利。每次好友出单(须签约),您均可获得推广费提成10%。

What’s new

Version 7.27.0 · Updated June 13, 2026

-大咖拓客精选全新升级 -修复已知问题​ 欢迎更新体验!

App privacy

The developer, 向日葵保险网, reported these privacy practices to Apple.

Data Linked to You

The following data, which may be collected and linked to your identity, may be used for the following purposes:

  • Financial Info: Payment Info
  • Contact Info: Name, Phone Number
  • User Content: Emails or Text Messages, Photos or Videos
  • Identifiers: User ID, Device ID

Used for: App Functionality

Data Not Linked to You

The following data, which may be collected but is not linked to your identity, may be used for the following purposes:

  • Usage Data: Product Interaction, Other Usage Data
  • Diagnostics: Crash Data, Performance Data, Other Diagnostic Data
  • Contact Info: Email Address
  • Search History: Search History

Used for: Analytics, Product Personalization

Alternatives to 向日葵保险人-保险展业获客签单赚钱神器!

Looking for apps like 向日葵保险人-保险展业获客签单赚钱神器!? Here are 6 similar apps on the App Store. The highest rated is 保险师—计划书、展业签单平台 (5.0/5), and all 6 are free to download.

向日葵保险人-保险展业获客签单赚钱神器! vs. alternatives
App Rating Price Last updated Compare
向日葵保险人-保险展业获客签单赚钱神器! – Free June 13, 2026
随身保典-保险师的移动展业签单工具 – Free Sep 15, 2026 Compare
保险师—计划书、展业签单平台 5.0 / 5 (1) Free Aug 11, 2026 Compare
Sunlogin Pilot – Free Oct 21, 2024 Compare
百度智能云-智能时代基础设施 1.0 / 5 (6) Free Jul 17, 2024 Compare
Files Go - media player 4.0 / 5 (30) Free Jul 15, 2025 Compare
掌上海关 1.4 / 5 (63) Free Oct 9, 2026 Compare

Compare 向日葵保险人-保险展业获客签单赚钱神器! with the top alternatives: ratings, updates, ASO score and keyword gaps →