比奇经典版-冲刺比奇
HuanZheng2022 Role Playing
"Beech Classic Edition - Dash Beech" is a brand-new role-playing game. The classic legendary gameplay is matched with the bloody story of Journey to the West, bringing you different fun!
- Rating
- 2.7
- 6 ratings
- Downloads
- 1K+
- on Google Play
- Price
- Free
- No in-app purchases
- Updated
- Jul 5
- 2022 · v1.0.13
Screenshots
About 比奇经典版-冲刺比奇
【游戏背景】
孙悟空出世及大闹天宫后，遇见了唐僧、猪八戒、沙僧和白龙马，西行取经，一路上历经艰险、妖怪魔法高强，经历了九九八十一难，终于到达西天见到如来佛祖，最终五圣成真。
【游戏特色】
进服满攻速，一秒6刀，超爽感受，至尊体验；
所有野外地图全部无限制进入，没有VIP门槛；
特色时装地图，BOSS爆时装、足迹，N套外观等你爆；
爆率超高，小怪也能爆终极；
装备绝对保值，高阶装备能合成能升阶，终极能爆能合绝对良心；
所有怪物均可爆转生材料，无需付费全靠爆！
What’s new
Version 1.0.13 · Updated July 5, 2022
A、鬼影迷踪技能持续时间小幅度上调 B、合成新增4套经典时装合成，可在锻造界面查看 C、修复阵眼强化界面显示错误问题 D、七星剑阵升级属性显示优化，显示额外加成 E、服务器优化，跨服匹配优化
Play today's Inkspill puzzle
Spread your ink until the whole board is one color, within the move limit. A free daily puzzle from Fiplay, same board for everyone. It plays right here, no download.
User reviews
很好玩 回味传奇 打装备 等刷boss 做的很好。 虽然氪金有些重 希望能改善让所有玩家都能打到票
Frequently asked questions
《比奇经典版-冲刺比奇》是什么类型的手游？
游戏背景是什么？
《比奇经典版-冲刺比奇》有哪些特色？
Alternatives to 比奇经典版-冲刺比奇
Looking for apps like 比奇经典版-冲刺比奇? Here are 6 similar Android apps on Google Play. The highest rated is Myth-M RPG: Apotheosize Game (4.8/5), and all 6 are free to download.
-
Myth-M RPG: Apotheosize Game 4.8
-
九州侠影录3D -快意恩仇，马上来战 2.4
-
神明的信號：全明星英雄烏龍亂鬥大冒險
-
武林外传-国际版 3.4
-
凡人修仙傳M-李逍遙與你修仙 4.7
-
御妖靈記
| App | Rating | Price | Installs | Last updated | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 比奇经典版-冲刺比奇 | 2.7 / 5 | Free | 1,000+ | Jul 5, 2022 | |
| Myth-M RPG: Apotheosize Game | 4.8 / 5 | Free | 1,000+ | Sep 24, 2022 | Compare |
| 九州侠影录3D -快意恩仇，马上来战 | 2.4 / 5 | Free | 50,000+ | Feb 28, 2024 | Compare |
| 神明的信號：全明星英雄烏龍亂鬥大冒險 | – | Free | 10+ | Oct 29, 2022 | Compare |
| 武林外传-国际版 | 3.4 / 5 | Free | 50,000+ | Sep 16, 2026 | Compare |
| 凡人修仙傳M-李逍遙與你修仙 | 4.7 / 5 | Free | 5,000+ | Jun 20, 2022 | Compare |
| 御妖靈記 | – | Free | 10,000+ | Apr 21, 2022 | Compare |
Compare 比奇经典版-冲刺比奇 with the top alternatives: ratings, updates, ASO score and keyword gaps →